Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
When I opened my card I found the NT-H1 was noticeably drier and was harder to remove on the die but still wet on the original extra squeeze. It was quite remarkable. Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut or Hydronaut, these pastes I have used like on air cooled builds or water cooled builds, they're best performers to extent, on older CPUs and GPUs not seen big difference between Kryonaut and NT-H1, where I have seen slight change in performance is on RTX 2080Ti where Kryonaut was better maybe like 1°C, on RTX 3090 or 3080 and 5950X Kryonaut usually dries out within 3-4 months or at least in my case this was happening, you can see that on temperatures increasing on core and GPU hot-spot temperature
Most pastes are made of ceramic or metallic materials suspended within a proprietary binder, allowing for easy application and spread and simple cleanup.Depending on their specific formula, these thermal pastes can be electrically conductive or non-conductive.Electrically conductive thermal pastes can carry electricity between two points, meaning that if the paste squeezes out onto other components, it can cause damage to motherboards and CPUs when you switch on the power. A single drop out of place can lead to a dead PC, so extra care is imperative.We're also putting a new take on an old approach to the test — thermal pads. These pads can be used as TIM and come as a single sheet you simply apply to your heatsink, with Thermaltake's Heilos Pad being the first new thermal pad entrant to see our test bed in the coming weeks. The acoustic results for the Frozen Notte aren’t bad in this worst case acoustic scenario, measuring just slightly louder than Fractal Design’s Celsius+ S28. 95W PPT It’s important to know these criteria because even if your thermal paste can support a high heat transferability, if it can’t be applied easily and evenly in a thin and flat layer, then that aspect can negate its heat-transferring qualities. Additionally, electrical conductivity will give you a hint as to how meticulous the application process will be overall.
We tested each thermal paste with a low-tension air cooler mount, high-tension air cooler mount, and a high-tension AIO liquid cooler mount. Each application was given a 1-hour burn-in using Prime95 with ten load and cooling cycles over the course of the hour; six minutes each with a ten-second cool-down between. Each testing load session was then executed for a one-hour load period, again using Prime95. I have similar results on Thermal Grizzly, Noctua NT-H2 or mentioned Streacom TX13 (and some others that I don't remember now). I had bad experience with TG as once in a while I had a dry tube and this stuff is expensive, so I'm not buying it anymore. SYY-157 is again good paste, easy to spread, cheap and performance is on par with TFX or Kryonaut, that thermal paste will not dry out after while, used that on few builds and no issues, this TIM I was using on my another RTX 3090 and no issues, temperatures was within 1-2°C from TFX and core to GPU hot-spot delta was in 8-10°C I used NT-H1 in my 3090 Eagle and the initial results were great with 70c just after repasting. However the temps kept climbing and now I'm around 80c after three months or so. For thermal paste application, we chose the 5-point method and allowed the thermal paste to be spread purely by the weight of the heatsink. The entire experiment was done in a fixed environment with 27oC room temperature.However, the results were different when paired with AMD’s Ryzen 7700X – performing only on par with high end air cooling. For this reason, I recommend the Frozen Notte 240 for cooling Intel’s i9-13900k – but not AMD’s Ryzen 7700X. Lowering the PPT to 75W further reduces the cooling difficulty, bringing CPU temperatures down to 40C over a 23C ambient temperature. As with the previous results, when paired with AMD’s Ryzen 7700X the Frozen Notte performs on par with Iceberg Thermal’s IceSLEET X7 Dual air cooler. TF8 is really more productive than the MX4, but it is impossible to talk about the product apart from its cost, and it costs almost 3 times more expensive than its analogue. In contrast, traditional thermal paste compounds are relatively simple for every experience level. Most, but not all, traditional pastes are electrically non-conductive.
ZF-EX is another great TIM for money, used that on my 5950X and on RTX 2080Ti Strix and Zotac RTX 2080Ti AMP and never had any problems with this TIM, didn't tested this TIM on RTX 3090 but I would suspect it would perform quite close to TFX or SYY-157 With your thermal paste applied, you're ready to install your cooler. There's no need to spread the paste around, as the metal base of the cooler will do this for you as you mount it. In fact, if you try and spread it manually, there's a good chance you'll spoil the distribution you were aiming for with the dots. Make sure you have all your mounting hardware handy before placing the cooler evenly on the center of your CPU. Then use the latches, pins, or screws of your cooler's mounting hardware to secure the CPU in place. Corsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always @100%, if applicable)We chose to run these tests with a PC build using minimal cooling. By minimizing the effects of the cooling system on CPU temperatures, we isolated the tested thermal pastes as the variable.
CPUs have incorporated ever more cores. Chiplets and hybrid architectures have proliferated, moving the most thermally demanding bits away from the exact center of the integrated heat spreader / lid of the CPU. And despite shrinking manufacturing nodes, many processors have just gotten physically bigger. So while you used to be able to apply thermal paste basically the same way across all consumer manufacturers and platforms and expect great results, that's no longer the case. Arctic Cooling MX-4 or MX-5 I was using on 3 builds in past and to the date(I built them like 8 months ago) I didn't replace TIM there, temperatures are still same and took apart only one of build and from TIM spread and viscosity of TIM, TIM is still okay and didn't dry out on GPUs, all 3 builds are running 3080 or 3080Ti and 3090 For a compound that costs less than half as much as leading competitors , Phobya's Liquid Metal Compound LM offers impressive performance, often besting the the CoolLaboratory Liquid Pro or Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut in our tests.
All testing is performed with a 23C ambient room temperature. Multiple thermal tests are run on each CPU to test the cooler in a variety of conditions, and acoustic measurements are taken with each result. These tests include: In any field, “best” always depends on several categories – which we’ll get to later – but everyone can agree that for thermal paste the “best” one needs to be able to maintain the lowest CPU temperature possible.
Great Deal 
New Comment